Skip to content
LOCAL NEWS. A CLEARER PICTURE. Follow the feed

Your city. Your daily perspective.
Local stories. The bigger picture.

BusinessAustin, Texas

New lawsuit challenges tax plan for Dog’s Head development in Austin

A new lawsuit is challenging Austin’s approval of the large Dog’s Head development in southeast Austin.

New lawsuit challenges tax plan for Dog's Head development in Austin

A new lawsuit is challenging Austin’s approval of the large Dog’s Head development in southeast Austin.

Save Our Springs Alliance, People Organized in Defense of Earth and Her Resources (PODER) and a group of neighbors and taxpayers say they’ve sued the city.

They’re seeking to block a tax incentive plan and a 45-year development agreement with Endeavor Real Estate Group. The Austin City Council approved the development agreement in July.

The developer plans to build thousands of homes, offices and retail space.

The council also voted to create a tax increment reinvestment zone for the project, which would use future property tax revenue to pay for things like roads and other infrastructure.

The groups argue the deal unlawfully diverts future property and sales tax revenue to the private development and gives away too much of the city’s future regulatory authority. The lawsuit asks a Travis County court to find both approvals invalid.

“Austin families are being priced out of the city, yet City Hall keeps asking residents to pay more and accept less,” Susana Almanza, executive director of PODER said in a statement. “Taxes keep going up, while basic services are being stretched thin or cut back. The last thing Austin should be doing is diverting billions in future public revenue away from libraries, parks, public safety and affordable housing to subsidize private development that was already moving forward.”

—

Read the full story at our news partner KVUE.com.

FROM THE SOURCE

This story was originally published by CultureMap Austin.

COMMUNITY

Discussion

Share your perspective. Please stay respectful and keep comments relevant to this story. Comments are reviewed before appearing.

Start the conversation — no comments here yet.

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your email address will not be published.

Discussion at the original source

These comments belong to readers of the original publisher. Replies here stay on this website.

Source comments are not available here. Visit the original article to check its discussion.

Open original article